-
1. Introduction to Science Communication
- 1.1 Learning from past mistakes
- 1.2 Case study: Cumbrian sheep farmers
- 1.3 Where did it go wrong
- 1.4 Moving towards a dialogue model
- 1.5 Science communication scale
- 1.6 The spectrum of public participation
- 1.7 Identify the participation level
- 1.8 Why should we engage the public with science?
- 1.9 Your science communication motivations
- 1.10 Bonus homework
- Introduction to science communication quiz
-
2. Dialogue
-
3. Audiences
- 3.1 Science? Not my cup of tea!
- 3.2 Rate your ‘capital’
- 3.3 Science capital
- 3.4 Case Study: Mr Okello’s class
- 3.5 Who has science capital?
- 3.6 There is no general public
- 3.7 Audience segmentation
- 3.8 Case Study: A V&A museum exhibition
- 3.9 Tailoring to specific needs and interests
- 3.10 Tailoring activity
- 3.11 Bonus Homework
- Audiences quiz
-
4. Presentation Skills
-
5. STEAM
-
6. Communications and Branding
-
7. Media and Journalism
- 7.1 The role of science media
- 7.2 Does the media harm science?
- 7.3 Journalism to ‘churnalism’
- 7.4 Fake news and alternative facts in a post-truth world
- 7.5 How do we tackle fake news and post-truth politics?
- 7.6 Misleading reports
- 7.7 Psychopathic gin drinkers
- 7.8 Bonus homework
- Media and journalism quiz
-
8. Online and Social
-
9. Writing
-
10. Videography
-
11. Evaluation and Planning
3.10 Tailoring activity
Your task is to get the British public engaged with a controversial issue of your choice. Go back to the segments identified in the PAS survey and select two or more to work with. For each one, design a new activity that will allow participants to learn about your topic. However, the activity should also be something those groups want to attend. Consider their interests, needs and behaviours. How can each event target these and align itself with the participant’s various forms of capital?
Remind yourself of the different segments here.